Models

Documentation > Models > Model Evaluation

Model Evaluation

After training a machine learning model, evaluating its performance is crucial to understand how well it will perform on new data. ML Clever provides comprehensive evaluation tools that help you interpret your model's strengths and weaknesses without requiring any coding knowledge.

Understanding Model Evaluation

Model evaluation is the process of analyzing how well your machine learning model performs against your objectives. It helps you determine if your model is ready for deployment or needs further refinement. ML Clever's evaluation dashboard is designed to make this process intuitive and accessible to users of all skill levels.

Why Evaluation Matters

Prevents Overfitting

Proper evaluation helps identify if your model is memorizing training data rather than learning generalizable patterns.

Validates Performance

Ensures your model can actually solve the business problem it was designed to address.

Builds Trust

Comprehensive evaluation builds confidence in your model's predictions for stakeholders.

Guides Improvement

Identifies specific areas where your model can be improved for better performance.

Pro Tip: When sharing model results with stakeholders who don't have technical backgrounds, include the AI-generated explanations to help them understand the model's performance in business terms. You can easily export these explanations as part of your model report.

Evaluation Best Practices

Follow these guidelines to get the most out of ML Clever's evaluation tools:

Define Success Criteria Before Training

Before you even train your model, establish clear thresholds for what constitutes acceptable performance for your specific use case. This prevents moving the goalposts after seeing results.

Look Beyond the Main Metric

While overall accuracy or R² might look good, always check secondary metrics and visualizations. A model with 95% accuracy might be missing a critical minority class entirely.

Compare Multiple Models

Train several different model types and compare their evaluation metrics. Sometimes a simpler model with slightly lower accuracy offers better explainability or generalization.

Evaluate on Representative Data

Ensure your test data truly represents the conditions under which the model will operate in production. If your test data differs significantly from real-world data, evaluation metrics may be misleading.

Use AI Explanations for Stakeholder Communication

When sharing model results with non-technical stakeholders, leverage the AI explanations to translate technical metrics into business impact. This builds confidence and understanding.

Document Your Evaluation Process

Keep detailed records of your evaluation criteria, results, and decisions. ML Clever allows you to export evaluation reports that can serve as documentation for compliance or future reference.

Troubleshooting Common Evaluation Issues

Metrics Don't Match Expectations

Your model's metrics are significantly lower than expected or differ from previous models.

Possible Solutions:

Check that you're using the right evaluation metric for your problem
Verify that your test data is representative of the problem space
Ensure preprocessing steps are consistent across training and testing
Look for data leakage that might have inflated previous results
Consider if your expectations are realistic given the complexity of the problem

Confusion Matrix Shows Biased Predictions

Your model consistently misclassifies certain classes or makes systematic errors.

Possible Solutions:

Check for class imbalance in your training data
Try class weighting or balancing techniques during training
Collect more data for underrepresented classes
Use stratified sampling to ensure all classes are represented in training
Consider a custom threshold for classification if needed

Feature Importance Doesn't Make Sense

The features your model identifies as important don't align with domain knowledge.

Possible Solutions:

Check for data leakage or proxy variables
Look for correlations between features that might be confusing the model
Consider if the unexpected important features might actually be valid signals
Try different feature selection methods or model types
Consult with domain experts to re-evaluate assumptions

Performance Varies Across Different Metrics

Your model performs well on some metrics but poorly on others.

Possible Solutions:

Determine which metrics are most important for your specific use case
Consider using a custom scoring function during training that balances important metrics
Try different model types that might perform better on your key metrics
Adjust classification thresholds to optimize for specific metrics
Use AI explanations to understand the trade-offs between different metrics

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I know if my model is good enough to deploy?

This depends on your specific use case and requirements. Generally, a model with a score above 75 is considered good. However, you should also consider business requirements, critical performance thresholds for specific metrics, and whether the model's errors are acceptable. The AI-powered explanations can help translate metrics into business impact.

What should I do if my model performance is poor?

Start by examining the specific areas where your model underperforms. Check feature importance charts to see if important features align with domain knowledge. Look for patterns in the confusion matrix or error distributions, and consider collecting more data, trying different preprocessing techniques, or using a different algorithm. The "AI Explanations" feature may also provide specific improvement recommendations.

How do I interpret a confusion matrix?

A confusion matrix shows how many instances of each actual class were predicted as each possible class. Diagonal elements represent correct predictions while off-diagonals represent misclassifications. Focus on rows with high misclassification to identify areas needing improvement.

Why do I see different metrics for classification and regression models?

Classification and regression are fundamentally different tasks. Classification models use metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, whereas regression models use metrics like RMSE, MAE, and R².

Making Decisions Based on Evaluation

After evaluating your model, decide whether it's ready for deployment or needs further improvement. Use this framework to guide your decision-making:

When to Deploy Your Model

Strong Overall Performance: Model score in the good to excellent range (75+)
Business Threshold Met: Key metrics exceed predefined thresholds
Consistent Performance: Stable performance across validation folds
No Critical Flaws: No concerning patterns in misclassifications or errors
Feature Importance Makes Sense: Key features align with domain knowledge

When to Iterate and Improve

Mediocre Performance: Model score in the average range (50-74)
Targeted Improvement Needed: Specific metrics fall short of targets
Class Imbalance Issues: Underperformance on minority classes
Unexpected Feature Importance: Features do not align with expectations
Signs of Overfitting: Large gap between training and validation performance

Recommended Actions:

Try different preprocessing or feature engineering techniques
Adjust hyperparameters or use a different algorithm
Collect more data, especially for underrepresented classes
Leverage AutoML with deeper optimization settings

When to Reconsider Your Approach

Poor Performance: Model score below 50 despite optimization
Persistent Critical Issues: Consistently poor performance on crucial metrics
Random-Like Behavior: Performance near random guessing (e.g., AUC ~0.5)
No Meaningful Feature Importance: All features showing minimal importance
Unstable Results: Wide variance across validation folds

Recommended Actions:

Reassess the problem or target variable
Review data quality and collection methods
Consider if the problem is too complex for available data
Consult with domain experts for deeper insights
Break the problem into smaller sub-problems

Evaluation Checklist

Use this checklist to ensure you've covered all critical aspects before finalizing your model.

Performance Metrics

Review all key metrics
Compare against business thresholds
Check performance across data segments

Visualizations

Review confusion matrix, scatter plots, etc.
Analyze feature importance or coefficients

Model Behavior

Test predictions on sample cases
Verify alignment with domain knowledge

Stakeholder Alignment

Share AI explanations with non-tech stakeholders
Confirm performance meets business needs

Accessing Model Evaluation

You can access evaluation metrics and visualizations in multiple ways:

From the Models Dashboard

Navigate to the "Models" section
Select your trained model from the list
Click the model card to view detailed results
Access evaluation metrics and visualizations via tabs

After Training Completion

When training finishes, click the "View Results" button
You will be taken directly to the evaluation dashboard
Tabs are pre-populated with your model's metrics

From Project Dashboards

Open a project that contains trained models
Click on any model to view its evaluation dashboard
All available metrics will be displayed

The Evaluation Interface

The interface is organized into tabs to easily switch between different metrics and visualizations.

Interface Components

Model Header Information

At the top, view essential model details:

Model Name: Editable on double-click
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)
Model Type: E.g., Random Forest, XGBoost
Training Time: When the model was trained
Dataset: Dataset used for training
Target: The target variable

Action Buttons

Options to interact with your model:

Create Dashboard: Generate a shareable dashboard
View Deployment: Deploy your model
Predict: Run predictions on new data
Toggle View: Switch between tab and multi-view layouts

Evaluation Tabs

Navigate through tabs for different aspects:

Metrics

Key metrics like accuracy, F1, RMSE, and MAE.

Coefficients/Feature Importance

Visualize influential features in your model.

Details

View model configuration and training information.

Scatter Plot

Visualizes predicted vs. actual values (regression).

Confusion Matrix

Shows prediction accuracy for classification.

ROC/PR Curves

Evaluate classification thresholds and performance.

Pro Tip: Toggle between "Tab View" and "Multi View" for focused or comparative analysis.

Understanding Performance Metrics

ML Clever provides metrics tailored to your model type. Here's how to interpret the most critical ones:

Classification Metrics

Metric	What It Measures	When To Focus On It
Accuracy	Overall percentage of correct predictions	When classes are balanced
Precision	How many positive predictions are correct	When false positives are costly
Recall	How many actual positives are captured	When missing positives is critical
F1 Score	Harmonic mean of precision and recall	For balanced performance
AUC-ROC	Ability to distinguish between classes	Overall model performance

Regression Metrics

Metric	What It Measures	When To Focus On It
RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error)	Average magnitude of errors with extra weight on large errors	When large errors are a concern
MAE (Mean Absolute Error)	Average absolute error of predictions	When all errors are equally important
R² (R-squared)	Proportion of variance explained by the model	For overall fit comparison
MSE (Mean Squared Error)	Average of squared prediction errors	When mathematical properties are optimized

The Model Score

ML Clever provides an overall performance score (0-100) calculated based on primary metrics, cross-validation stability, model complexity, and dataset factors.